Overview

Click to expand overview
Analysts like Sarang Shidore highlight that BRICS can be viewed as having two main blocs: the “Global East” (e.g, China, Russia) often countering the U.S, and a more 11 de sept. de 2025 According to a press release leading up to the recent BRICS Summit 2025, there was a waiting list of 40 countries expressing interest in being admitted to the group, an With new members, particularly those with independent or even adversarial relationships with the U.S, the bloc may unite more firmly against Western policies. They may BRICS is fostering goodwill among its full- and partner-member states as the US affirms tariffs against countries big and small, friend or foe. BRICS is exploring how to best engage with the What we have found is that the common portrayal of BRICS as a China-dominated group primarily pursuing anti-U.S. agendas is misplaced. Rather, the BRICS countries connect around A handful of countries along with BRICS are seething rage against the U.S. for its foreign policy that. World One News Page: Tuesday

BRICS Expansion: Is the U.S. Losing Influence as Developing Countries Unite?

The global landscape is shifting. With a growing number of developing nations seeking alternatives to traditional Western partnerships, the BRICS bloc (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) is gaining momentum. But what does this expansion mean for the U.S. and its global influence? Is it a sign of diminishing American power, or a more complex realignment?

Recent developments suggest a surge in interest towards BRICS. According to a press release leading up to the recent BRICS Summit 2025, there was a waiting list of 40 countries expressing interest in being admitted to the group. This surge indicates a desire among developing economies to foster closer ties and potentially challenge the existing global order.

BRICS: A Counterweight to U.S. Influence?

Some analysts argue that BRICS represents a direct challenge to the U.S.'s dominance. With new members, particularly those with independent or even adversarial relationships with the U.S, the bloc may unite more firmly against Western policies. They may be seeking alternative avenues for trade, investment, and political cooperation, reducing their reliance on the U.S. and its allies.

However, the picture is more nuanced. As Analysts like Sarang Shidore highlight that BRICS can be viewed as having two main blocs: the “Global East” (e.g, China, Russia) often countering the U.S, and a more diverse group with varying priorities. The common portrayal of BRICS as a China-dominated group primarily pursuing anti-U.S. agendas is misplaced. Rather, the BRICS countries connect around shared developmental goals and a desire for a more multipolar world.

U.S. Foreign Policy and the Rise of BRICS

It's undeniable that some countries, including some within or partnering with BRICS, harbor resentment towards U.S. foreign policy. Indeed, a handful of countries along with BRICS are seething rage against the U.S. for its foreign policy that is often perceived as interventionist or self-serving. Furthermore, BRICS is fostering goodwill among its full- and partner-member states as the US affirms tariffs against countries big and small, friend or foe. BRICS is exploring how to best engage with the challenging aspects of the new global dynamic.

BRICS: Opportunity or Threat?

Whether the rise of BRICS represents a threat or an opportunity for the U.S. remains to be seen. A more multipolar world could lead to increased competition but also greater opportunities for collaboration on global challenges like climate change and pandemic preparedness. The U.S. needs to adapt its foreign policy and engage with BRICS countries constructively to navigate this evolving global landscape. World One News Page: Tuesday's headlines are closely watching this developing story and the impact on international relations come 11 de sept. de 2025.

Top Sources

Related Articles