Overview

Click to expand overview
The once high-flying crypto mogul repeatedly veered away from his lawyers’ strategy, including on how to handle prosecutors’ tough questions on cross-examination. A Wednesday filing revealed the intention of Sam Bankman-Fried’s attorneys to quiz him on the involvement of legal counsel in certain operations at the now-defunct The attorneys compared SBF’s case to Jeffery Epstein’s child sex trafficking case to demonstrate how less severe the downfall of FTX was. As a result, they requested to Odaily Planet Daily News: SBF, the former CEO of FTX, has appealed the judge's decision to allow the identities of the two people who signed a $250 million bail for him to be made public. ChainCatcher news, according to Bloomberg, FTX founder SBF asked the judge not to publicly disclose the identities of the two guarantors who helped him obtain bail. The SBF’s lawyers succeed to block the identities of two persons who signed off the $250 million bail bond for SBF. Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) is a co-founder & former Eight major media companies including Bloomberg, The Financial Times and Reuters have demanded public disclosure of the two individuals responsible for

FTX SBF: Attorneys Fight to Conceal Guarantor Identities Until Valentine's Day?

The legal saga surrounding FTX and its co-founder & former CEO, Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), continues with a new twist: SBF's attorneys are reportedly battling to keep the identities of his bail guarantors secret, potentially until Valentine's Day. Eight major media companies including Bloomberg, The Financial Times and Reuters have demanded public disclosure of the two individuals responsible for signing off on the $250 million bail bond for SBF.

This move comes amidst increasing scrutiny of SBF's legal strategy and actions. The once high-flying crypto mogul repeatedly veered away from his lawyers’ strategy, including on how to handle prosecutors’ tough questions on cross-examination. This has reportedly complicated their efforts to mount a successful defense. A Wednesday filing revealed the intention of Sam Bankman-Fried’s attorneys to quiz him on the involvement of legal counsel in certain operations at the now-defunct FTX.

SBF has appealed the judge's decision to allow the identities of the two people who signed a $250 million bail for him to be made public, according to Odaily Planet Daily News and ChainCatcher news. The SBF’s lawyers attempt to block the identities of two persons who signed off the $250 million bail bond for SBF raises questions about transparency and fairness in the legal process. Why the need for secrecy? What are the potential implications for the case?

Interestingly, The attorneys compared SBF’s case to Jeffery Epstein’s child sex trafficking case to demonstrate how less severe the downfall of FTX was. This comparison, while potentially intended to mitigate the perceived severity of the charges against SBF, has drawn criticism and raised eyebrows.

Bloomberg reported that FTX founder SBF asked the judge not to publicly disclose the identities of the two guarantors who helped him obtain bail. The request to conceal the identities, potentially until Valentine's Day, suggests a desire to protect these individuals from potential public scrutiny or repercussions. The outcome of this legal battle will likely have significant implications for the ongoing FTX case and the broader cryptocurrency landscape.

Top Sources

Related Articles